For more about cover letters, see Cover Letter Attachment. If you’re cramped for space, don’t drop important details in favor of making space to address reviewer comments. But be careful not to assume that the reviewers were the problem—first thoroughly size up the application’s faults that they identified. Were they knowledgeable about your methods? Summary statements for new investigator R01 applications are prioritized, and when possible, released before summary statements for other applications reviewed in the same meeting. Keep in mind, if you list potential reviewers in conflict, acceptable explanations are conflict of interest, competitor, or long-standing scientific disagreement. You probably want to jump right into your resubmission, but first check your original funding opportunity announcement FOA to confirm it hasn’t expired, you still meet eligibility requirements, and NIAID or your chosen institute still participates.
To identify substantial scientific changes, do the following: Then ask yourself these questions: January 29, Minutes: Highlight your reviewers’ comments in your introduction and the body of your application, usually in the Research Plan. Here’s how to proceed:
And if you need additional preliminary data or new data is imminent, wait until you have it before resubmitting. You may want to begin revising even before you get your summary statement since waiting may cause you to miss the next receipt date.
Visitor Information Contact Us. Resubmissions have several unique rules.
Were they knowledgeable about your methods? Strengthen the application as much as you can.
Though you may be able to start revising before you get your summary statement, you’ll need the summary statement for your discussion with your program officer and to address the reviewers’ feedback in the application. Options if Your Application Isn’t Funded. On this form you can: Your resubmission can take one resubmizsion two paths: Content last reviewed on May 4, That’s cofer clue that your application and the study section were a poor fit.
You have just one opportunity to resubmit.
Revise and Resubmit an Application | NIH: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Ultimately your scientific review officer SRO will decide whether to exclude reviewers. If you disagree, explain why, and provide additional information if possible. June 4, Minutes: Skip to main content.
More In This Issue. Rules for Resubmitting Resubmissions have several unique rules.
That said, many people get funded after revising, and usually a resubmission can’t hurt you. If covdr wait to submit for the Cycle 3 receipt dates May Council instead, you could lose just a month or two before you actually get an award.
Some people begin revising even before getting the summary statement because waiting may cause them to miss the next receipt date. Many resubmissions score better than the initial application, though of course there’s no guarantee.
You Will Still Use Cover Letters, but Not for Assignment Requests
Read more at Plan Ahead for Video. Summary statements for new investigator R01 applications are prioritized, and when possible, released before summary statements for other applications reviewed in the same meeting.
Reviewers look at the application in the context of nuh critiques, so the approach is effective if you can readily answer their concerns. Don’t launch into your resubmission until you’ve read our instructions and advice below.
Faubion used yellow highlighting.
Abutment Plague in San Francisco: But you’ll still want to check your new FOA for the information we just mentioned. Be aware that your application may still face some new reviewers who may raise different issues.
Revise and Resubmit an Application
Responds to major weaknesses raised in the summary statement. If the verdict is no for any of the above, the study section may not have been the best fit. For more about cover letters, see Cover Letter Attachment.
You may be able to start revising right away, but take the time to do the best job you can.